Introduction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has revolutionized musculoskeletal radiology, providing exceptional detail of the shoulder anatomy without the need for ionizing radiation. MRI sequences such as T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), Proton Density Fat-Saturated (PD Fat Sat), and Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) are instrumental in diagnosing a variety of shoulder pathologies. This article delves into the intricacies of shoulder MRI anatomy and the characteristic appearances on different MRI sequences.

Normal Shoulder Anatomy on MRI

The shoulder joint is complex, involving the articulation of the humerus with the glenoid cavity of the scapula. It is supported by a system of muscles, tendons, ligaments, and the joint capsule. On MRI, each tissue type exhibits distinct characteristics that vary depending on the imaging sequence used.

T1-Weighted Imaging

T1-weighted images are excellent for evaluating the anatomy of the shoulder in great detail. Fat appears bright on T1, while fluid and most soft tissue structures are of intermediate to low signal intensity. This contrast allows for the precise delineation of the muscular anatomy, such as the rotator cuff muscles - the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis - and the cortical bone and marrow fat within the humeral head.

T2-Weighted Imaging

T2-weighted images are fluid-sensitive and provide high contrast between fluid and soft tissue, making them ideal for detecting edema, inflammation, and fluid collections. On T2 sequences, fluid appears bright, and fat signals are relatively suppressed. This contrast allows for the visualization of joint effusions, bursitis, and tendon sheath fluid, as well as highlighting pathology within the bone marrow, such as edema associated with fractures.

Proton Density Fat-Saturated Imaging

PD Fat Sat imaging uses a frequency-selective fat suppression technique to nullify the bright signal of fat seen on T1 and PD sequences. This sequence accentuates the visibility of the rotator cuff tendons, the glenohumeral ligaments, and the labrum. It is particularly useful for identifying subtle tears in the rotator cuff and for better visualization of the joint capsule.

STIR Imaging

STIR imaging is another fluid-sensitive sequence with fat suppression but uses an inversion pulse to nullify the signal from fat. It is highly sensitive to changes in water content and is excellent for detecting bone marrow edema, which is a sign of acute injury. The signal from the rotator cuff tendons is low on STIR images, contrasting with the high signal of fluid, making it an excellent sequence for detecting pathology such as tendon tears.

Pathological Appearances on MRI Sequences

The MRI sequences can be utilized to detect and characterize various shoulder pathologies:

Rotator Cuff Tears: On T1, these may appear as areas of increased signal within the tendon, while on T2, PD Fat Sat, and STIR, tears are seen as high signal intensity areas interrupting the low signal intensity of the tendon.

Tendonitis and Tendinopathy: Tendons may appear thickened with increased signal on T2, PD Fat Sat, and STIR sequences.

Labral Tears: These are best visualized on T2 and PD Fat Sat sequences, where the high signal fluid enters the labrum, indicating a tear.

Glenohumeral Ligament Injury: Ligament injuries show increased signal on T2 and STIR images, often with associated effusion or edema.

Bone Marrow Edema: This appears as increased signal on T2, PD Fat Sat, and STIR sequences and is indicative of a variety of pathologies, including traumatic injury, infection, or arthritis.

Clinical Applications

Each MRI sequence provides unique information that can help clinicians arrive at a diagnosis:

T1: Best for anatomy and detecting fatty infiltration of muscles.

T2: Ideal for highlighting acute inflammation and fluid.

PD Fat Sat: Enhances detection of subtle tendon and ligament injuries.

STIR: Highly sensitive for bone marrow pathology and small collections of fluid.

Conclusion

MRI is a crucial tool for the detailed evaluation of shoulder anatomy and pathology. T1, T2, PD Fat Sat, and STIR sequences each have unique properties that make them suitable for visualizing different tissue contrasts and pathologies. A comprehensive understanding of the shoulder anatomy and the appearances of various structures on these sequences allows for accurate diagnosis and guides effective treatment planning.

References

Stoller, D. W. (2007). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Tirman, P. F. J., Bost, F. W., Steinbach, L. S., Belzer, J. P., & Crues, J. V. (2004). MR Imaging of the Shoulder. Radiology.

Deutsch, A., & Altchek, D. W. (2006). MRI of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiology, 35(8), 543-554.

Waldt, S., Burkart, A., Imhoff, A. B., & Bruegel, M. (2005). MR imaging of the shoulder: Rotator cuff. European Radiology, 15(3), 605-615.

Hodler, J., Kursunoglu-Brahme, S., Snyder, S. J., et al. (1992). MR imaging of the shoulder after surgery. American Journal of Roentgenology, 158(6), 1281-1287.

Beltran, J., Bencardino, J., Mellado, J., Rosenberg, Z. S., & Firpo, C. (2001). MR Arthrography of the Shoulder: Variants and Pitfalls. Radiographics, 21(6), 1451-1465.

Faruch Bilfeld, M., Lapègue, F., Sans, N., & Chiavassa Gandois, H. (2018). MRI of the shoulder: A review of common and rare disorders. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 99(12), 803-814.

Vahlensieck, M. (2000). MRI of the shoulder. European Radiology, 10(2), 242-249.

Morag, Y., Jacobson, J. A., Shields, G., et al. (2006). MR Arthrography of Rotator Cuff Tendon and Labral Tears: Is It Worth the Pain? Radiology, 240(2), 418-424.

Zappia, M., Carfora, M., Romano, A. M., et al. (2016). Anatomy, variants, and pathologies of the superior glenohumeral ligament: MRI with arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiology, 45(6), 789-800.